ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2023
Mitotic DNA damage promotes chromokinesin-mediated missegregation of polar chromosomes in cancer cells.
Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polar chromosomes are rescued from missegregation by spindle elongation-driven microtubule pivoting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cancer-associated USP28 missense mutations disrupt 53BP1 interaction and p53 stabilization.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Translational Aspects of DNA Damage Repair in Optimizing Cancer Chemotherapy.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Targeting CyclinD1-CDK6 to Mitigate Senescence-Driven Inflammation and Age-Associated Functional Decline.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- TET2 germline variants promote kidney disease by impairing DNA repair and activating cytosolic nucleotide sensors.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA damage response (DDR) during interphase involves active signaling and repair to ensure genomic stability. However, how mitotic cells respond to DNA damage remains poorly understood. Supported by correlative live-/fixed-cell microscopy, it was found that mitotic cells exposed to several cancer chemotherapy compounds acquire and signal DNA damage, regardless of how they interact with DNA. In-depth analysis upon DNA damage during mitosis revealed a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC)-dependent, but ataxia telangiectasia mutated-independent, mitotic delay. This delay was due to the presence of misaligned chromosomes that ultimately satisfy the SAC and missegregate, leading to micronuclei formation. Mechanistically, it is shown that mitotic DNA damage causes missegregation of polar chromosomes due to the action of arm-ejection forces by chromokinesins. Importantly, with the exception of DNA damage induced by etoposide-a topoisomerase II inhibitor-this outcome was independent of a general effect on kinetochore microtubule stability. Colony formation assays in pan-cancer cell line models revealed that mitotic DNA damage causes distinct cytotoxic effects, depending on the nature and extent of the damage. Overall, these findings unveil and raise awareness that therapeutic DNA damage regimens may contribute to genomic instability through a surprising link with chromokinesin-mediated missegregation of polar chromosomes in cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.