ReviewCVIR endovascular2023
Embolization for acute nonvariceal bleeding of upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review.
Review in CVIR endovascular, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computed Tomography-Proven Active Bleeding with Negative Emergency Angiography: Early Mortality Predictors and Development of the Negative Angiography Bleeding-Lethality Score.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Transarterial chemoembolization with prophylactic right inferior phrenic artery embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in segments VII and VIII.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Imipenem/Cilastatin Sodium as Reabsorbable Embolic Agent in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Multicentric Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trans-radial and "Snuffbox" Access Versus Trans-femoral Access in Emergency Embolization: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 421 Procedures.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Radiologic Interventions for Gastrointestinal Bleeding.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with angiography-negative duodenal ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Child-Pugh Stage Predicts Survival in Hospitalized Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: A 10-Year Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Interventional radiological management of traumatic pelvic, retroperitoneal and gastrointestinal hemorrhages].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Prognostic relevance of contrast extravasation in patients undergoing endovascular embolization of acute bleeding.European radiology · 2026Article
- Determinants of clinical outcome after transarterial embolization for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Prophylactic transarterial embolization after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding - is it time to act?Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Emergency embolization of acute hemorrhage: cone-beam computed tomography with advanced planning and guidance software-a systematic review and case series.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Endoscopic hemostasis combined with vascular interventional therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Immediate Femoral Sheath Removal After Emergency Embolization in the Age of Ultrasound-Guided Device-Assisted Vascular Closure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Role of Radiology in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Transarterial embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective bicentric study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Comparative efficacy of gelatin sponge, microcoils, and nbca in arterial gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Trans-arterial embolization for treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding-a multicenter analysis".European radiology · 2025Article
- Trans-arterial embolization for treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding-a multicenter analysis.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleedings (GIBs) are pathological conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Embolization without angiographic evidence of contrast media extravasation is proposed as an effective procedure in patients with clinical and/or laboratory signs of bleeding. The purpose of this systematic review is to define common clinical practice and clinical and technical outcomes of blind and preventive embolization for upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. MAIN BODY: Through the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar database, an extensive search was performed in the fields of empiric and preventive embolization for the treatment of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleedings (UGIB and LGIB). Inclusion criteria were: articles in English for which it has been possible to access the entire content; adults patients treated with empiric or blind transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for UGIB and/or LGIB. Only studies that analysed clinical and technical success rate of blind and empiric TAE for UGIB and/or LGIB were considered for our research. Exclusion criteria were: recurrent articles from the same authors, articles written in other languages, those in which the entire content could not be accessed and that articles were not consistent to the purposes of our research. We collected pooled data on 1019 patients from 32 separate articles selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 22 studies focused on UGIB (total 773 patients), one articles focused on LGIB (total 6 patients) and 9 studies enrolled patients with both UGIB and LGIB (total 240 patients). Technical success rate varied from 62% to 100%, with a mean value of 97.7%; clinical success rate varied from 51% to 100% with a mean value of 80%. The total number of complications was 57 events out of 1019 procedures analysed.
conclusionTAE is an effective procedure in the treatment of UGIB patients in which angiography does not demonstrate direct sign of ongoing bleeding. The attitude in the treatment of LGIBs must be more prudent in relation to poor vascular anastomoses and the high risk of intestinal ischemia. Blind and preventive procedures cumulatively present a relatively low risk of complications, compared to a relatively high technical and clinical success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.