Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988819›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2023

Human Uterine Lavage: First Live Births from In Vivo Conceived Genetically Screened Blastocysts.

Sam Najmabadi, José L Rivas, Marlane J Angle, Alexander Nadal, Ercan Bastu, Santiago Munné, Sandra A Carson, John E Buster, Steven T Nakajima

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03426007 (Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Human Uterine Lavage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03426007 naunknown statusnot on this map

Controlled Ovarian Stimulation and Human Uterine Lavage: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrevivo GeneticsRan2017 to 2019Enrolled500ConditionsInfertility, FemaleArmsUterine lavage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sam NajmabadiCenter for Reproductive Health and Gynecology, 99 N. La Cienega Blvd., Suite 109, Beverly Hills, CA, 90211, USA.
José L RivasPunta Mita Fertility Center/Center for Reproductive Health and Gynecology, Punta Mita Hospital, Ramal Carretera Federal 200 KM 19 No. 1, C.P. 63734, Punta de Mita, Nayarit, Mexico.
Marlane J AngleLaurel Fertility Care, 1700 California St., San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA.
Alexander NadalPrevivo Genetics, Inc, 10233 South Parker Road, Suite 300, Parker, CO, 80134, USA.
Ercan BastuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey.
Santiago MunnéOverture Life, Avenida de Europa 4, Alcobendas, 28108, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra A CarsonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University, 310 Cedar Street, RM 337, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
John E BusterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 101 Dudley St., Providence, RI, 02905, USA.
Steven T NakajimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1195 West Fremont Ave., Suite 1301, Sunnyvale, CA, 94087, USA. stevenn@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-6763
Yale University · USAcıbadem University · TRBrown University · USCARE Fertility · USParker Hannifin (United States) · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe wish to report the first live births from genetically screened human euploid blastocysts obtained by uterine lavage. The embryos transferred to infertile women were previously obtained using a novel fully automated uterine lavage catheter and fluid recovery device developed for this indication. The objective of this portion of the research was to confirm embryo implantation and live births with these unique in vivo conceived blastocysts obtained by uterine lavage.

methodsIn vivo conceived embryos recovered by uterine lavage 5 days after intrauterine insemination were available for embryo donation. In vivo embryos were the result of prior controlled ovarian stimulation cycles in oocyte donors and intrauterine insemination with donor sperm. An observational case series of nine embryo transfer procedures was performed at an outpatient fertility center. One to two embryos were transferred to eight infertile women since one woman had two separate embryo transfer procedures.

resultsNine embryo transfer procedures were performed with 14 blastocysts in eight women resulting in a blastocyst implantation rate of 36% (5/14) and live birth rate of 44% (4/9). Five infants have been born from the four delivered pregnancies with one set of twins.

conclusionsThis is the first report of live births from genetically screened human euploid blastocysts obtained by uterine lavage. The nonsurgical uterine lavage office procedure represents the only current approach to obtain in vivo conceived embryos and can provide a benchmark for comparison to standard in vitro cultured blastocysts. Live births of in vivo conceived blastocysts represent the validation that the nonsurgical uterine lavage procedure allows simplified access to naturally conceived embryos without performing the surgical procedure of an oocyte aspiration. Owing to its simplicity, uterine lavage may be useful in screening embryos for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in fertile and infertile couples. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03426007).

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleLive BirthBlastocystEmbryo DispositionFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMalePregnancySemenTherapeutic IrrigationBlastocystEuploidHumanUterine lavage

Identifiers

PMID36988819
OpenAlexW4361290033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.