Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988788›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2023

A comparison of consistent UV treatment versus inconsistent UV treatment in horticultural production of lettuce.

Martin Weiland, Caspar Friedrich Weßler, Thomas Filler, Johannes Glaab, Neysha Lobo Ploch, Ulrike Winterwerber, Melanie Wiesner-Reinhold, Monika Schreiner, Susanne Neugart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The use of natural extracts with photoprotective activity: a 2015-2023 patent prospection.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Martin WeilandInstitute for Biology, Experimental Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstr. 42, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Caspar Friedrich WeßlerLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops e.v., Plant Quality and Food Security, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979, Grossbeeren, Germany.
Thomas FillerFerdinand-Braun-Institut (FBH), Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 4, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Johannes GlaabFerdinand-Braun-Institut (FBH), Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 4, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Neysha Lobo PlochFerdinand-Braun-Institut (FBH), Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 4, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike WinterwerberFerdinand-Braun-Institut (FBH), Gustav-Kirchhoff-Str. 4, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
Melanie Wiesner-ReinholdLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops e.v., Plant Quality and Food Security, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979, Grossbeeren, Germany.
Monika SchreinerLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops e.v., Plant Quality and Food Security, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979, Grossbeeren, Germany.
Susanne NeugartDivision Quality and Sensory of Plant Products, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Carl-Sprengel-Weg 1, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. Susanne.neugart@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-6733
Ferdinand-Braun-Institut · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeibniz University Hannover · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 03ZZ0128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV radiation is an underrated radiation currently missing in many horticultural production systems of vegetables in protected cultivation. It can be added e.g., in LED light sources. Using lettuce as a model plant, this study determined whether the use of UVB LEDs is suitable (1) for use in consistent systems (indoor farming) or (2) inconsistent systems (greenhouse). Blue and red LEDs were selected as additional artificial lighting to UVB LEDs. Both approaches led to a reproducible increase of desired flavonol glycosides, such as quercetin-3-O-(6''-O-malonyl)-glucoside or quercetin-3-O-glucuronide and the anthocyanin cyanidin-3-O-(6''-O-malonyl)-glucoside in lettuce. The impact of the consistent UVB treatment is higher with up to tenfold changes than that of the inconsistent UVB treatment in the greenhouse. Varying natural light and temperature conditions in greenhouses might affect the efficiency of the artificial UVB treatment. Here, UVB LEDs have been tested and can be recommended for further development of lighting systems in indoor farming and greenhouse approaches.

Indexed as

LactucaUltraviolet RaysGlucosidesGlycosidesQuercetinGlucosidesGlycosidesQuercetinAnthocyaninsFlavonoid glycosidesHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesUVBVertical farming

Identifiers

PMID36988788
OpenAlexW4361302099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.