Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988755›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2023

Incorporating Functional Response Time Effects into a Signal Detection Theory Model.

Sun-Joo Cho, Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Paul De Boeck, Matthew Naveiras, Si On Yoon, Aaron Benjamin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Outcomes of autologous bone graftsWorld journal of orthopedics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sun-Joo ChoVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA. sj.cho@vanderbilt.edu.
Sarah Brown-SchmidtVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Paul De BoeckThe Ohio State University and KU Leuven, Columbus, USA.
Matthew NaveirasVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Si On YoonUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Aaron BenjaminUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1851690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signal detection theory (SDT; Tanner & Swets in Psychological Review 61:401-409, 1954) is a dominant modeling framework used for evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic systems that seek to distinguish signal from noise in psychology. Although the use of response time data in psychometric models has increased in recent years, the incorporation of response time data into SDT models remains a relatively underexplored approach to distinguishing signal from noise. Functional response time effects are hypothesized in SDT models, based on findings from other related psychometric models with response time data. In this study, an SDT model is extended to incorporate functional response time effects using smooth functions and to include all sources of variability in SDT model parameters across trials, participants, and items in the experimental data. The extended SDT model with smooth functions is formulated as a generalized linear mixed-effects model and implemented in the gamm4 R package. The extended model is illustrated using recognition memory data to understand how conversational language is remembered. Accuracy of parameter estimates and the importance of modeling variability in detecting the experimental condition effects and functional response time effects are shown in conditions similar to the empirical data set via a simulation study. In addition, the type 1 error rate of the test for a smooth function of response time is evaluated.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologySignal Detection, PsychologicalComputer SimulationHumansPsychometricsReaction Timegeneralized additive mixed modelgeneralized linear mixed-effects modelresponse timesignal detection theorysmooth function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.