Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988739›Full record

ArticleArchives of virology2023

A linear SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine candidate reduces virus shedding in ferrets.

Mathias Martins, Gabriela M do Nascimento, Antonella Conforti, Jessica C G Noll, Joseph A Impellizeri, Elisa Sanchez, Bettina Wagner, Lucia Lione, Erika Salvatori, Eleonora Pinto and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathias Martins *Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Gabriela M do Nascimento *Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Antonella ConfortiTakis Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Jessica C G NollDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Joseph A ImpellizeriVeterinary Oncology Services, New York, NY, USA.
Elisa SanchezVeterinary Oncology Services, New York, NY, USA.
Bettina WagnerDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Lucia LioneTakis Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Erika SalvatoriTakis Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora PintoTakis Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Mirco CompagnoneNeomatrix Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Brian ViscountApplied DNA Sciences, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
James HaywardApplied DNA Sciences, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Clay ShorrockApplied DNA Sciences, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Luigi AurisicchioTakis Biotech, Rome, Italy.
Diego G DielDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. dgdiel@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-8940
Cornell University · USApplied DNA Sciences (United States) · USNew York Oncology Hematology · US

Funding

Applied DNA Applied DNA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has caused more than 760 million cases and over 6.8 million deaths as of March 2023. Vaccination has been the main strategy used to contain the spread of the virus and to prevent hospitalizations and deaths. Currently, two mRNA-based vaccines and one adenovirus-vectored vaccine have been approved and are available for use in the U.S. population. The versatility, low cost, and rapid production of DNA vaccines provide important advantages over other platforms. Additionally, DNA vaccines efficiently induce both B- and T-cell responses by expressing the antigen within transfected host cells, and the antigen, after being processed into peptides, can associate with MHC class I or II of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to stimulate different T cell responses. However, the efficiency of DNA vaccination needs to be improved for use in humans. Importantly, in vivo DNA delivery combined with electroporation (EP) has been used successfully in the field of veterinary oncology, resulting in high rates of response after electrochemotherapy. Here, we evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of a novel linear SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine candidate delivered by intramuscular injection followed by electroporation (Vet-ePorator™) in ferrets. The linear SARS-CoV-2 DNA vaccine candidate did not cause unexpected side effects. Additionally, the vaccine elicited neutralizing antibodies and T cell responses on day 42 post-immunization using a low dose of the linear DNA construct in a prime-boost regimen. Most importantly, vaccination significantly reduced shedding of infectious SARS-CoV-2 through oral and nasal secretions in a ferret model.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vaccines, DNAViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesDNAFerretsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirus SheddingAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesDNASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, DNAViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36988739
PMCPMC10052258
OpenAlexW4361298183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.