ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Effects of timing of umbilical cord clamping for mother and newborn: a narrative review.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of administration routes of oxytocin on hemoglobin in neonates with delayed umbilical cord clamping: a multi-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Trial
- Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Respiratory Infection-Related Encounters in the First 6 Months of Life in an Urban Community Hospital.International journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- CD71+ erythroid cells as a potential early biomarker for hemodynamic significant patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Qualineo Strategy Indicators Associated with Neonatal Death: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis narrative review was performed to evaluate the correct timing of umbilical cord clamping for term infants. It was intended to determine any advantages or disadvantages from early or delayed cord clamping for newborns, infants or mothers.
methodsA systematic search on two databases was conducted using the PICO pattern to define a wide search. Out of 43 trials, 12 were included in this review. Three of the included studies are meta-analyses, nine are randomized controlled trials.
resultsEarly or delayed cord clamping was defined differently in all the included trials. However, there are many advantages from delayed cord clamping of at least > 60 s for newborns and infants up to 12 months of age. The trials showed no disadvantages for newborns or mothers from delayed cord clamping, except for a lightly increased risk of jaundice or the need for phototherapy.
conclusionDelayed umbilical cord clamping for term infants should be performed. Further research is needed to improve knowledge on physiological timing of umbilical cord clamping in term infants, which also leads to the same advantages as delayed cord clamping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.