Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988416›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2024

Theory- and evidence-based best practices for physical activity counseling for adults with spinal cord injury.

Femke Hoekstra, Heather L Gainforth, Rogier Broeksteeg, Stephanie Corras, Delaney Collins, Sonja Gaudet, Emily E Giroux, Shannon McCallum, Jasmin K Ma, Diane Rakiecki and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06154122 (The Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Activities for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of People With Acute/Sub-Acute Tetraplegia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06154122 nacompletednot on this map

The Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Activities for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of People With Acute/Sub-Acute Tetraplegia

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsTetraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Upper Extremity ParalysisArmsVirtual Reality Upper Limb Rehabilitation Games, Upper Limb Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Femke HoekstraSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0068-652X
Heather L GainforthSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Rogier BroeksteegRijndam Rehabilitation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Stephanie CorrasSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Delaney CollinsSchool of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Sonja GaudetSpinal Cord Injury British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Emily E GirouxSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Shannon McCallumTherapeutic Recreation Program, St. Lawrence College, Kingston, Canada.
Jasmin K MaInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Diane RakieckiSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada.
Shannon RockallPraxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Rita van den Berg-EmonsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anniek van VilsterenVogellanden Revalidatie Centrum, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Jereme WilroyDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3496-7389
Kathleen A Martin GinisInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-3594
University of British Columbia · CACodarts Rotterdam · NLDalhousie University · CAErasmus MC · NLOkanagan College · CAPraxis Spinal Cord Institute · CAQueen's University · CARoessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie · NLSt. Lawrence College · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis project used a systematic and integrated knowledge translation (IKT) approach to co-create theory- and evidence-based best practices for physical activity counseling for adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsGuided by the IKT Guiding Principles, we meaningfully engaged research users throughout this project. A systematic approach was used. An international, multidisciplinary expert panel (

resultsThe best practices document includes an introduction, the best practices, things to keep in mind, and a glossary. Best practices focused on how to deliver a conversation and what to discuss during a conversation. Examples include: build rapport, use a client-centred approach following the spirit of motivational interviewing, understand your client's physical activity barriers, and share the SCI physical activity guidelines. External experts (

conclusionWe present the first systematically co-developed theory- and evidence-based best practices for SCI physical activity counseling. The implementation of the best practices will be supported by developing training modules. These new best practices can contribute to optimizing SCI physical activity counseling services across settings.

Indexed as

CounselingSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultEvidence-Based MedicineEvidence-Based PracticeExerciseHumansBehavioral supportCounseling servicesPhysical activitySpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID36988416
PMCPMC11218585
OpenAlexW4361283484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.