Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988381›Full record

SynthesisHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2023

Acute rejection after liver transplantation with machine perfusion versus static cold storage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marianna Maspero, Khaled Ali, Beatrice Cazzaniga, Sumeyye Yilmaz, Roma Raj, Qiang Liu, Cristiano Quintini, Charles Miller, Koji Hashimoto, Robert L Fairchild and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Amatoxin poisoning with acute liver failure].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diagnostic and predictive biomarkers of acute rejection after liver transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Marianna MasperoTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7589-4489
Khaled AliTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-9114-897
Beatrice CazzanigaTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-3180-9078
Sumeyye YilmazTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-2482-1570
Roma RajTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-4207-066
Qiang LiuTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-8126-9295
Cristiano QuintiniTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-6802-1436
Charles MillerTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-7389
Koji HashimotoTransplantation Center, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-6777
Robert L FairchildDepartment of Immunology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7107-5259
Andrea SchlegelFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9385-9847
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAcute cellular rejection (ACR) is a frequent complication after liver transplantation. By reducing ischemia and graft damage, dynamic preservation techniques may diminish ACR. We performed a systematic review to assess the effect of currently tested organ perfusion (OP) approaches versus static cold storage (SCS) on post-transplant ACR-rates. APPROACH AND

resultsA systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted. Studies reporting ACR-rates between OP and SCS and comprising at least 10 liver transplants performed with either hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE), normothermic machine perfusion, or normothermic regional perfusion were included. Studies with mixed perfusion approaches were excluded. Eight studies were identified (226 patients in OP and 330 in SCS). Six studies were on HOPE, one on normothermic machine perfusion, and one on normothermic regional perfusion. At meta-analysis, OP was associated with a reduction in ACR compared with SCS [OR: 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33-0.91), p =0.02]. This effect remained significant when considering HOPE alone [OR: 0.54 (95% CI, 0.29-1), p =0.05], in a subgroup analysis of studies including only grafts from donation after cardiac death [OR: 0.43 (0.20-0.91) p =0.03], and in HOPE studies with only donation after cardiac death grafts [OR: 0.37 (0.14-1), p =0.05].

conclusionsDynamic OP techniques are associated with a reduction in ACR after liver transplantation compared with SCS. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022348356.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationDeathGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansLiverOrgan PreservationPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID36988381
OpenAlexW4361296922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.