Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988227›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Eye movements disrupt EEG alpha-band coding of behaviorally relevant and irrelevant spatial locations held in working memory.

Tom Bullock, Kamryn Pickett, Anabel Salimian, Caitlin Gregory, Mary H MacLean, Barry Giesbrecht

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tom BullockDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8551-905X
Kamryn PickettDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.
Anabel SalimianDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-3713
Caitlin GregoryDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.
Mary H MacLeanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.
Barry GiesbrechtDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-1251
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oscillations in the alpha frequency band (∼8-12 Hz) of the human electroencephalogram play an important role in supporting selective attention to visual items and maintaining their spatial locations in working memory (WM). Recent findings suggest that spatial information maintained in alpha is modulated by interruptions to continuous visual input, such that attention shifts, eye closure, and backward masking of the encoded item cause reconstructed representations of remembered locations to become degraded. Here, we investigated how another common visual disruption-eye movements-modulates reconstructions of behaviorally relevant and irrelevant item locations held in WM. Participants completed a delayed estimation task, where they encoded and recalled either the location or color of an object after a brief retention period. During retention, participants either fixated at the center or executed a sequence of eye movements. Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at the scalp and eye position was monitored with an eye tracker. Inverted encoding modeling (IEM) was applied to reconstruct location-selective responses across multiple frequency bands during encoding and retention. Location-selective responses were successfully reconstructed from alpha activity during retention where participants fixated at the center, but these reconstructions were disrupted during eye movements. Recall performance decreased during eye-movements conditions but remained largely intact, and further analyses revealed that under specific task conditions, it was possible to reconstruct retained location information from lower frequency bands (1-4 Hz) during eye movements. These results suggest that eye movements disrupt maintained spatial information in alpha in a manner consistent with other acute interruptions to continuous visual input, but this information may be represented in other frequency bands.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMemory, Short-TermElectroencephalographyHumansMental RecallOrientation, Spatialalphaeye movementsinverted encoding modelspatial representationsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36988227
PMCPMC10190932
OpenAlexW4361303342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.