Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36988179›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2023

Proteomics and lipidomics in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction.

Nick S Nurmohamed, Jordan M Kraaijenhof, Manuel Mayr, Stephen J Nicholls, Wolfgang Koenig, Alberico L Catapano, Erik S G Stroes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Nick S NurmohamedDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9045-6009
Jordan M KraaijenhofDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-6403
Manuel MayrSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Science, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-829X
Stephen J NichollsVictorian Heart Institute, Monash University, 631 Blackburn Rd, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-4368
Wolfgang KoenigDeutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-9603
Alberico L CatapanoDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-2094
Erik S G StroesDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-6260
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKing's College London · GBMonash University · AUUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/16/3/32406British Heart Foundation RG/F/21/110053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the limited accuracy of clinically used risk scores such as the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 system and the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease 2 risk scores, novel risk algorithms determining an individual's susceptibility of future incident or recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk are urgently needed. Due to major improvements in assay techniques, multimarker proteomic and lipidomic panels hold the promise to be reliably assessed in a high-throughput routine. Novel machine learning-based approaches have facilitated the use of this high-dimensional data resulting from these analyses for ASCVD risk prediction. More than a dozen of large-scale retrospective studies using different sets of biomarkers and different statistical methods have consistently demonstrated the additive prognostic value of these panels over traditionally used clinical risk scores. Prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of a biomarker panel in clinical ASCVD risk stratification. When combined with the genetic predisposition captured with polygenic risk scores and the actual ASCVD phenotype observed with coronary artery imaging, proteomics and lipidomics can advance understanding of the complex multifactorial causes underlying an individual's ASCVD risk.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseBiomarkersHumansLipidomicsProteomicsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersASCVDLipidomicsMultiomicsProteomicsRisk score

Identifiers

PMID36988179
PMCPMC10163980
OpenAlexW4361267603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.