ArticleMedical physics2023
Fully-automated detection of small bowel carcinoid tumors in CT scans using deep learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Trial
- Progress in fully automated abdominal CT interpretation-an update over the past decade.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmall bowel carcinoid tumor is a rare neoplasm and increasing in incidence. Patients with small bowel carcinoid tumors often experience long delays in diagnosis due to the vague symptoms, slow growth of tumors, and lack of clinician awareness. Computed tomography (CT) is the most common imaging study for diagnosis of small bowel carcinoid tumor. It is often used with positron emission tomography (PET) to capture anatomical and functional aspects of carcinoid tumors and thus to increase the sensitivity. PURPOSE: We compared three different kinds of methods for the automatic detection of small bowel carcinoid tumors on CT scans, which is the first to the best of our knowledge.
methodsThirty-three preoperative CT scans of 33 unique patients with surgically-proven carcinoid tumors within the small bowel were collected. Ground-truth segmentation of tumors was drawn on CT scans by referring to available
resultsThe detection network method performed the best among the compared methods. For lesion-level detection, the detection network method, without the small bowel segmentation-based filtering, achieved sensitivity values of (60.8%, 81.1%, 82.4%, 86.5%) at per-scan FP rates of (1, 2, 4 ,8), respectively. The use of the small bowel segmentation did not improve the performance (
conclusionsThe carcinoid tumors in this patient population were very small and potentially difficult to diagnose. The presented method showed reasonable sensitivity at small numbers of FPs for lesion-level detection. It also achieved a promising AUC for patient-level detection. The method may have clinical application in patients with this rare and difficult to detect disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.