Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36987849›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2023

Using clinical decision support to improve urine testing and antibiotic utilization.

Michael E Yarrington, Staci S Reynolds, Tray Dunkerson, Fabienne McClellan, Christopher R Polage, Rebekah W Moehring, Becky A Smith, Jessica L Seidelman, Sarah S Lewis, Sonali D Advani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impact of Boric Acid tubes on quantitative urinary bacterial cultures in hospitalized patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael E YarringtonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-1519
Staci S ReynoldsDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-1328
Tray DunkersonDuke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.
Fabienne McClellanContinuous Improvement Department, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher R PolageClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebekah W MoehringDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Becky A SmithDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jessica L SeidelmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah S LewisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Sonali D AdvaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5162-6482
Duke University · USDuke University Health System · US

Funding

Duke KURe ProgramK12DK100024 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2013 to 2026
$8.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUrine cultures collected from catheterized patients have a high likelihood of false-positive results due to colonization. We examined the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool that includes catheter information on test utilization and patient-level outcomes.

methodsThis before-and-after intervention study was conducted at 3 hospitals in North Carolina. In March 2021, a CDS tool was incorporated into urine-culture order entry in the electronic health record, providing education about indications for culture and suggesting catheter removal or exchange prior to specimen collection for catheters present >7 days. We used an interrupted time-series analysis with Poisson regression to evaluate the impact of CDS implementation on utilization of urinalyses and urine cultures, antibiotic use, and other outcomes during the pre- and postintervention periods.

resultsThe CDS tool was prompted in 38,361 instances of urine cultures ordered in all patients, including 2,133 catheterized patients during the postintervention study period. There was significant decrease in urine culture orders (1.4% decrease per month;

conclusionCDS tools can aid in optimizing urine culture collection practices and can serve as a reminder for removal or exchange of long-term indwelling urinary catheters at the time of urine-culture collection.

Indexed as

Catheter-Related InfectionsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalUrinalysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatheters, IndwellingHumansUrinary CathetersUrineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID36987849
PMCPMC10539479
OpenAlexW4361198891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.