ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2023
The promise of single session interventions for eating disorders: Lessons to be learned from research on digital mental health. Commentary on Schleider et al. (2023).
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability and Efficacy of a Web-Based, Intuitive Eating-Focused Single Session Intervention for Recurrent Binge Eating: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Trial
- Improving body image in female Chinese social media users with eating disorder symptoms: a randomized controlled trial of two online self-guided single-session interventions.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- The promise of single session interventions for eating disorders: Lessons to be learned from research on digital mental health. Commentary on Schleider et al. (2023).The International journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schleider et al. propose that single session interventions (SSIs) could be a promising path toward catalyzing innovation in the development of accessible interventions for eating disorders (EDs). In this commentary, we contend that the arguments made by Schleider et al. raise many unresolved questions that continue to arise in the broader field. Drawing from our experiences with-and lessons learned from-developing, evaluating, and disseminating digital health interventions, we discuss four key empirical questions that should be addressed in order to realize the full potential of SSIs and other innovations in intervention delivery. These include: (i) for whom do we deliver an SSI; (ii) what are the optimal treatment mechanisms to target; (iii) what constitutes a "good" outcome; and (iv) where and how might we embed innovations like these. The SSI approach is a fruitful area of research enquiry, and we hope that this commentary generates further discussion and high-quality, collaborative work related to improving treatment accessibility and clinical outcomes among people with EDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.