Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36987692›Full record

ArticleBiopolymers2024

Kinetics of diffusion-influenced multisite phosphorylation with enzyme reactivation.

Irina V Gopich, Attila Szabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopolymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irina V GopichLaboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-8419
Attila SzaboLaboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA.

Funding

Theoretical Studies On The Dynamic Aspects Of Macromolecular FunctionZIADK029019 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI SZABO, ATTILA · 2009 to 2024
$15.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK029019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simplest way to account for the influence of diffusion on the kinetics of multisite phosphorylation is to modify the rate constants in the conventional rate equations of chemical kinetics. We have previously shown that this is not enough and new transitions between the reactants must also be introduced. Here we extend our results by considering enzymes that are inactive after modifying the substrate and need time to become active again. This generalization leads to a surprising result. The introduction of enzyme reactivation results in a diffusion-modified kinetic scheme with a new transition that has a negative rate constant. The reason for this is that mapping non-Markovian rate equations onto Markovian ones with time-independent rate constants is not a good approximation at short times. We then developed a non-Markovian theory that involves memory kernels instead of rate constants. This theory is now valid at short times, but is more challenging to use. As an example, the diffusion-modified kinetic scheme with new connections was used to calculate kinetics of double phosphorylation and steady-state response in a phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle. We have reproduced the loss of bistability in the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle when the enzyme reactivation time decreases, which was obtained by particle-based computer simulations.

Indexed as

PhosphorylationDiffusionKineticsbistabilitydiffusion-limited reactionmemory kernelsphosphorylation

Identifiers

PMID36987692
PMCPMC10539481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.