Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36987390›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2023

The impact of antihypertensive treatment of mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Armin Attar, Alireza Hosseinpour, Mana Moghadami

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Updates in the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Armin AttarDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-4870
Alireza HosseinpourDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4175-8059
Mana MoghadamiClinical Education Research Center, Department of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is controversy regarding the treatment of pregnant patients with mild hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-109 mm Hg). While guidelines do not recommend this treatment, results from recent clinical trials are supportive of the treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify if active treatment of mild hypertension during pregnancy results in better maternal and fetal outcomes. All of the potentially eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a systematic database search investigating the impact of pharmacological treatment in mild hypertensive patients on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Data from 12 trials comprising 4461 pregnant women diagnosed with mild to moderate hypertension (2395 in the intervention group and 2066 in the control group) were extracted for quantitative synthesis. Antihypertensive treatment was associated with better outcomes in seven out of the 19 analyzed outcomes: Severe hypertension (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = [0.38;0.75]), preeclampsia (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = [0.54; 0.93]), placental abruption (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = [0.26; 0.87]), changes in electrocardiogram (RR = 0.43; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.72]), renal impairment (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = [0.34; 0.51]), pulmonary edema (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = [0.25; 0.84]), and neonatal mortality (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = [0.57; 0.92]). The primary safety outcome of small for gestational age was not different between the treatment group and the control group (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = [0.80; 1.57]). The results of this meta-analysis are in favor of the beneficial impact of pharmacological treatment of mild hypertension on both maternal and neonatal outcomes and without significant adverse events for the fetus.

Indexed as

HypertensionPre-EclampsiaAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive Agentsantihypertensive treatmentchronic hypertensionfetal outcomesgestational hypertensionmaternal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36987390
PMCPMC10189071
OpenAlexW4361290871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.