Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36987370›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Current State of the Art and Next Generation of Materials for a Customized IntraOcular Lens according to a Patient-Specific Eye Power.

Martina Vacalebre, Renato Frison, Carmelo Corsaro, Fortunato Neri, Antonio Santoro, Sabrina Conoci, Elena Anastasi, Maria Cristina Curatolo, Enza Fazio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Presbyopia Correction in Lens Replacement Surgery: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Application of Silicone in Ophthalmology: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cataract: Surgery first - is there still room for basic research?Advances in ophthalmology practice and research
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina VacalebreDipartimento di Scienze Matematiche ed Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra (MIFT), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9199-3850
Renato FrisonOptical Consultant SIFI SpA, 95025 Aci Sant'Antonio (CT), Italy.
Carmelo CorsaroDipartimento di Scienze Matematiche ed Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra (MIFT), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-8750
Fortunato NeriDipartimento di Scienze Matematiche ed Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra (MIFT), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9130-9972
Antonio SantoroDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Biologiche, Farmacologiche ed Ambientali (CHIBIOFARAM), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4015-0359
Sabrina ConociDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Biologiche, Farmacologiche ed Ambientali (CHIBIOFARAM), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.
Elena AnastasiInnovation and Medical Science, SIFI SpA, 95025 Aci Sant'Antonio (CT), Italy.
Maria Cristina CuratoloInnovation and Medical Science, SIFI SpA, 95025 Aci Sant'Antonio (CT), Italy.
Enza FazioDipartimento di Scienze Matematiche ed Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra (MIFT), Università di Messina, V.le Ferdinando Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9132-7073
University of Messina · ITOptica · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) are commonly implanted after surgical removal of a cataractous lens. A variety of IOL materials are currently available, including collamer, hydrophobic acrylic, hydrophilic acrylic, PHEMA copolymer, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and silicone. High-quality polymers with distinct physical and optical properties for IOL manufacturing and in line with the highest quality standards on the market have evolved to encompass medical needs. Each of them and their packaging show unique advantages and disadvantages. Here, we highlight the evolution of polymeric materials and mainly the current state of the art of the unique properties of some polymeric systems used for IOL design, identifying current limitations for future improvements. We investigate the characteristics of the next generation of IOL materials, which must satisfy biocompatibility requirements and have tuneable refractive index to create patient-specific eye power, preventing formation of posterior capsular opacification.

Indexed as

aberrationacrylic materialsGRadient INdex lenshydrogelhydrophilicityhydrophobicityintraocular lensMTF

Identifiers

PMID36987370
PMCPMC10054364
OpenAlexW4360616232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.