ArticlePolymers2023
Fracture Load of Mesio-Occluso-Distal Composite Restorations Performed with Different Reinforcement Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Review
- Clinical Observations on Postless Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth with Immediate Pre-Endodontic Dentin Sealing and an Internal Adhesive Ferrule: A Case Series.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Performance of Polyethylene Fibers and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorations: A Scoping Review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Evaluation of fracture resistance and crack propensity of bulk-fill composite restorations reinforced by polyethylene fiber.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Influence of composite resin type and curing method on the fracture resistance of class II restorations: An in vitro comparison.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2025Article
- Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored With Different Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Comparative In Vitro Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Restorative Dentistry: The Role of Polyethylene Fiber in Biomimetic Dentin Reinforcement-Insights from In Vitro Research.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Fracture resistance of teeth restored with polyethylene fibers reinforced composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
- Effects of minimally invasive endodontic access cavity in molar teeth on polymerization, porosity and fracture resistance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect coronal restorations: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Fracture Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Polymers · 2023Review
- Study on the Restoration of Class II Carious Cavities by Virtual Methods: Simulation of Mechanical Behavior.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity preparations are often fragile due to the amount of tooth and carious structure removed. MOD cavities can often fracture if left unsupported.
aimThe study investigated the maximum fracture load of mesi-occluso-distal cavities restored using direct composite resin restorations with various reinforcement techniques.
methodSeventy-two freshly extracted, intact human posterior teeth were disinfected, checked, and prepared according to predetermined standards for mesio-occluso-distal cavity design (MOD). The teeth were assigned randomly into six groups. The first group was the control group restored conventionally with a nanohybrid composite resin (Group I). The other five groups were restored with a nanohybrid composite resin reinforced with different techniques: the ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Restorative and -Liner as a dentin substitute and layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group II); the everX Posterior composite resin layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group III); polyethylene fibers called "Ribbond" placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity, and layered with a nanohybrid composite (Group IV); polyethylene fibers placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity, and layered with the ACTIVA BioACTIVE-Restorative and -Liner as a dentin substitute and nanohybrid composite (Group V); and polyethylene fibers placed on both axial walls and the floor of the cavity and layered with the everX posterior composite resin and nanohybrid composite (Group VI). All teeth were subjected to thermocycling to simulate the oral environment. The maximum load was measured using a universal testing machine.
resultsThe highest maximum load was exhibited by Group III with the everX posterior composite resin, followed by Group IV, Group VI, Group I, Group II, and Group V. A statistically significant difference was demonstrated between groups (
conclusionsWithin the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that a higher maximum load resistance can be achieved (statistically significant) when reinforcing nanohybrid composite resin MOD restorations with everX Posterior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.