Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36987123›Full record

ReviewPolymers2023

Eggshell Membrane as a Biomaterial for Bone Regeneration.

Adriana Torres-Mansilla, Maxwell Hincke, Ana Voltes, Elena López-Ruiz, Paula Alejandra Baldión, Juan Antonio Marchal, Pedro Álvarez-Lloret, Jaime Gómez-Morales

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recent Advances in Egg White Biotechnology, Microbiology, and Quality.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriana Torres-MansillaDepartamento de Geología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33005 Asturias, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8969-2060
Maxwell HinckeDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H8M5, Canada.
Ana VoltesBiopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 180171 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9459-3569
Elena López-RuizBiopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 180171 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7863-0497
Paula Alejandra BaldiónDepartamento de Salud Oral, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3134-9198
Juan Antonio MarchalBiopathology and Regenerative Medicine Institute (IBIMER), Centre for Biomedical Research (CIBM), University of Granada, 180171 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-8261
Pedro Álvarez-LloretDepartamento de Geología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33005 Asturias, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5325-183X
Jaime Gómez-MoralesLaboratorio de Estudios Cristalográficos IACT-CSIC-UGR, Avda. Las Palmeras, No. 4, Armilla, 18100 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-7797
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Oviedo · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Consejería de Economía y Universidad, Junta de Andalucía PYC20 RE 015 UGR; P20_00208 of 2020European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) - Next Generation / EU PALFICYT AYUD/2022/33525Fundación Mutua Madrileña FMM-AP17196-2019Instituto de Salud Carlos III, ERDF DTS21/00098MCIN/AEI PID2022-142886NB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia de Innovación PGC2018-102047-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physicochemical features of the avian eggshell membrane play an essential role in the process of calcium carbonate deposition during shell mineralization, giving rise to a porous mineralized tissue with remarkable mechanical properties and biological functions. The membrane could be useful by itself or as a bi-dimensional scaffold to build future bone-regenerative materials. This review focuses on the biological, physical, and mechanical properties of the eggshell membrane that could be useful for that purpose. Due to its low cost and wide availability as a waste byproduct of the egg processing industry, repurposing the eggshell membrane for bone bio-material manufacturing fulfills the principles of a circular economy. In addition, eggshell membrane particles have has the potential to be used as bio-ink for 3D printing of tailored implantable scaffolds. Herein, a literature review was conducted to ascertain the degree to which the properties of the eggshell membrane satisfy the requirements for the development of bone scaffolds. In principle, it is biocompatible and non-cytotoxic, and induces proliferation and differentiation of different cell types. Moreover, when implanted in animal models, it elicits a mild inflammatory response and displays characteristics of stability and biodegradability. Furthermore, the eggshell membrane possesses a mechanical viscoelastic behavior comparable to other collagen-based systems. Overall, the biological, physical, and mechanical features of the eggshell membrane, which can be further tuned and improved, make this natural polymer suitable as a basic component for developing new bone graft materials.

Indexed as

biopolymerbone biomaterialbone scaffoldbone tissue engineeringeggshell membraneorganic matrix

Identifiers

PMID36987123
PMCPMC10057008
OpenAlexW4323568352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.