Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986736›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2023

Status and Future Scope of Soft Nanoparticles-Based Hydrogel in Wound Healing.

Marcel Henrique Marcondes Sari, Alexandre de Fátima Cobre, Roberto Pontarolo, Luana Mota Ferreira

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A critical overview of challenging roles of medicinal plants in improvement of wound healing technology.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Eradication ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NaturalGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Therapeutic Management of Malignant Wounds: An Update.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcel Henrique Marcondes SariPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9913-9306
Alexandre de Fátima CobrePostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6642-3928
Roberto PontaroloPostgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7049-4363
Luana Mota FerreiraPharmacy Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-587X
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wounds are alterations in skin integrity resulting from any type of trauma. The healing process is complex, involving inflammation and reactive oxygen species formation. Therapeutic approaches for the wound healing process are diverse, associating dressings and topical pharmacological agents with antiseptics, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial actions. Effective treatment must maintain occlusion and moisture in the wound site, suitable capacity for the absorption of exudates, gas exchange, and the release of bioactives, thus stimulating healing. However, conventional treatments have some limitations regarding the technological properties of formulations, such as sensory characteristics, ease of application, residence time, and low active penetration in the skin. Particularly, the available treatments may have low efficacy, unsatisfactory hemostatic performance, prolonged duration, and adverse effects. In this sense, there is significant growth in research focusing on improving the treatment of wounds. Thus, soft nanoparticles-based hydrogels emerge as promising alternatives to accelerate the healing process due to their improved rheological characteristics, increased occlusion and bioadhesiveness, greater skin permeation, controlled drug release, and a more pleasant sensory aspect in comparison to conventional forms. Soft nanoparticles are based on organic material from a natural or synthetic source and include liposomes, micelles, nanoemulsions, and polymeric nanoparticles. This scoping review describes and discusses the main advantages of soft nanoparticle-based hydrogels in the wound healing process. Herein, a state-of-the-art is presented by addressing general aspects of the healing process, current status and limitations of non-encapsulated drug-based hydrogels, and hydrogels formed by different polymers containing soft nanostructures for wound healing. Collectively, the presence of soft nanoparticles improved the performance of natural and synthetic bioactive compounds in hydrogels employed for wound healing, demonstrating the scientific advances obtained so far.

Indexed as

cutaneous lesionsgelnanostructuresnatural productspolymers

Identifiers

PMID36986736
PMCPMC10057168
OpenAlexW4323569006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.