Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986675›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

A Computational Model for the Release of Bioactive Molecules by the Hydrolytic Degradation of a Functionalized Polyester-Based Scaffold.

Elisa Batoni, Amedeo Franco Bonatti, Carmelo De Maria, Kenneth Dalgarno, Raasti Naseem, Umberto Dianzani, Casimiro Luca Gigliotti, Elena Boggio, Giovanni Vozzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bioactive Endodontic Hydrogels: From Parameters to Personalized Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa BatoniResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-6988
Amedeo Franco BonattiResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-5135
Carmelo De MariaResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-3571
Kenneth DalgarnoSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-8044
Raasti NaseemSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1978-4370
Umberto DianzaniDepartment of Health Sciences, Università de Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Casimiro Luca GigliottiDepartment of Health Sciences, Università de Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3127-5686
Elena BoggioDepartment of Health Sciences, Università de Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2700-3597
Giovanni VozziResearch Center E. Piaggio, Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-9994
University of Pisa · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITNewcastle University · GB

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 814410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents a computational model to study the degradation behavior of polyester-based three-dimensional (3D) functionalized scaffolds for bone regeneration. As a case study, we investigated the behavior of a 3D-printed scaffold presenting a functionalized surface with ICOS-Fc, a bioactive protein able to stimulate bone regeneration and healing, inhibiting osteoclast activity. The aim of the model was to optimize the scaffold design to control its degradation and thus the release of grafted protein over time and space. Two different scenarios were considered: (i) a scaffold without macroporosity presenting a functionalized external surface; and (ii) a scaffold presenting an internal functionalized macroporous architecture with open channels to locally deliver the degradation products.

Indexed as

bioactive moleculesbone scaffoldhydrolytic degradation modelingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36986675
PMCPMC10057942
OpenAlexW4322774895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.