ReviewPharmaceutics2023
An Adequate Pharmaceutical Quality System for Personalized Preparation.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmacy compounding of personalized preparations has evolved a great deal, and with it, the way of working and the legal requirements have also evolved. An adequate pharmaceutical quality system for personalized preparations presents fundamental differences with respect to the system designed for industrial medicines since the size, complexity, and characteristics of the activity of the manufacturing laboratory and the applications and uses of the manufactured medicines must be taken into account. Legislation must advance and adapt to the needs of personalized preparations, filling the deficiencies currently found in this field. The limitations of personalized preparation in its pharmaceutical quality system are analysed and a method based on a proficiency testing program specially designed to overcome these limitations is proposed: the Personalized Preparation Quality Assurance Program (PACMI). This method makes it possible to expand the samples and destructive tests, and dedicate more resources, facilities, and equipment. It allows for more in-depth knowledge of the product and the processes used, and for proposed improvements that increase the overall quality for improved patient health. PACMI introduces tools used in risk management in order to guarantee the quality of an essentially heterogeneous service: personalized preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.