Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986526›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Evaluation of ctDNA in the Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Prognosis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study.

Marina Morais, Telma Fonseca, Diogo Melo-Pinto, Isabel Prieto, Ana Teresa Vilares, Ana Luísa Duarte, Patrícia Leitão, Luís Cirnes, José Carlos Machado, Silvestre Carneiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina MoraisDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, 4464-513 Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-1233
Telma FonsecaDepartment of Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João EPE, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Diogo Melo-PintoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, 4464-513 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Isabel PrietoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Ana Teresa VilaresDepartment of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João EPE, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Luísa DuarteDepartment of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João EPE, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Patrícia LeitãoDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, 4464-513 Matosinhos, Portugal.
Luís CirnesDiagnostics Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of Porto University, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
José Carlos MachadoDiagnostics Group, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of Porto University, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4741-8415
Silvestre CarneiroDepartment of Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João EPE, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Hospital de São João · PTHospital Pedro Hispano · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTHospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

Sociedade Portuguesa de Coloproctologia nº1/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Watch and wait" is becoming a common treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) submitted to neoadjuvant treatment. However, currently, no clinical modality has an acceptable accuracy for predicting pathological complete response (pCR). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting the response and prognosis in these patients. We prospectively enrolled a cohort of three Iberian centers between January 2020 and December 2021 and performed an analysis on the association of ctDNA with the main response outcomes and disease-free survival (DFS). The rate of pCR in the total sample was 15.3%. A total of 24 plasma samples from 18 patients were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. At baseline, mutations were detected in 38.9%, with the most common being

Indexed as

ctDNAdisease-free survivallocally advanced rectal cancerneoadjuvant chemoradiationnext-generation sequencingprediction of response

Identifiers

PMID36986526
PMCPMC10057108
OpenAlexW4324064991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.