Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986513›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Noe Garin, Borja Zarate-Tamames, Laura Gras-Martin, Raimon Milà, Astrid Crespo-Lessmann, Elena Curto, Marta Hernandez, Conxita Mestres, Vicente Plaza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determinants of Inhaler Choice at Hospital Discharge.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noe GarinDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-9453
Borja Zarate-TamamesDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Laura Gras-MartinDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Raimon MilàSchool of Health Science Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3857-9666
Astrid Crespo-LessmannDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
Elena CurtoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-0543
Marta HernandezSchool of Health Science Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6983-413X
Conxita MestresSchool of Health Science Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-3108
Vicente PlazaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2567-5496
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Ramon Llull · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into the characteristics and clinical impact of electronic monitoring devices of inhalers (EMDs) and their clinical interventions in adult patients with asthma or COPD. The search included PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases, as well as official EMDs websites. We found eight observational studies and ten clinical trials, assessing a wide range of clinical outcomes. Results from the meta-analysis on adherence to inhalers in a period over three months were favourable in the EMD group (fixed effects model: SMD: 0.36 [0.25-0.48]; random effects model SMD: 0.41 [0.22-0.60]). An exploratory meta-analysis found an improvement in ACT score (fixed effect model SMD: 0.25 [0.11-0.39]; random effects model: SMD: 0.47 [-0.14-1.08]). Other clinical outcomes showed mixed results in the descriptive analyses. The findings of this review highlight the benefits of EMDs in the optimization of adherence to inhaled therapy as well as the potential interest in other clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

asthmaclinical outcomesCOPDelectronic monitoring devicemedication adherencemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36986513
PMCPMC10055893
OpenAlexW4323664269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.