Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986342›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Environmental Factors Associated with

Xihan Wang, Xu Wang, Jianping Cao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in parasitology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. WaterborneJournal of water and health · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and molecular characterisation ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Prevalence and risk factors ofVeterinarni medicina · 2025
    Article
  17. Analysis of Reported Cases ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xihan WangChinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, School of Global Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Xu WangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research), National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Shanghai 200025, China.
Jianping CaoChinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, School of Global Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1974-0047
National Institute for Parasitic Diseases · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971969National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272369the Three-Year Public Health Action Plan (2020-2022) of Shanghai GWV-10.1-XK13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental factors significantly influence the transmission of intestinal protozoan diseases. Cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis are important zoonotic diseases characterized by diarrhea, and are mainly water or foodborne diseases caused by fecal-borne oocysts. The One Health approach effectively addresses environmentally influenced zoonotic diseases. However, the impact of environmental factors on the survival of

Indexed as

climateCryptosporidiumenvironmental factorGiardiaOne Healthsoil

Identifiers

PMID36986342
PMCPMC10056321
OpenAlexW4323566148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.