Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36986339›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effective Treatments of UTI-Is Intravesical Therapy the Future?

Chris J Morris, Jennifer L Rohn, Scott Glickman, Kylie J Mansfield

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Adjunctive intravesical EDTA-tromethamine treatment of a biofilm-associated recurrentThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris J MorrisSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-4474
Jennifer L RohnDivision of Medicine, University College London, Royal Free Hospital Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Scott GlickmanUroPharma Ltd., Norwich NR1 1PY, UK.
Kylie J MansfieldGraduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) afflicts millions of patients globally each year. While the majority of UTIs are successfully treated with orally administered antibiotics, the impact of oral antibiotics on the host microbiota is under close research scrutiny and the potential for dysbiosis is a cause for concern. Optimal treatment of UTI relies upon the selection of an agent which displays appropriate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) properties that will deliver appropriately high concentrations in the urinary tract after oral administration. Alternatively, high local concentrations of antibiotic at the urothelial surface can be achieved by direct instillation into the urinary tract. For antibiotics with the appropriate physicochemical properties, this can be of critical importance in cases for which an intracellular urothelial bacterial reservoir is suspected. In this review, we summarise the underpinning biopharmaceutical barriers to effective treatment of UTI and provide an overview of the evidence for the deployment of the intravesical administration route for antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibioticintravesicalurinary tract infectionurothelium

Identifiers

PMID36986339
PMCPMC10058863
OpenAlexW4323361918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.