Assessment of Vascular Function in Response to High-Fat and Low-Fat Ground Beef Consumption in Men.

Jason R Lytle, Sean T Stanelle, Steven E Martin, Stephen B Smith, Dana R Smith, Stephen F Crouse

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial

In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason R LytleKBR, Houston, TX 77058, USA.

Sean T StanelleDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Steven E MartinDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1500-3314

Stephen B SmithDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-8281

Dana R SmithIndependent Nutrition Consultant, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

Stephen F CrouseDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.

Texas A&M University · USKBR (United States) · US

Funding

National Cattlemen's Beef Association 1806182

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red meat is stigmatized as an unhealthy protein choice; however, its impacts on vascular function have not been evaluated. We aimed to measure the vascular impact of adding either low-fat (~5% fat) ground beef (LFB) or high-fat (~25% fat) ground beef (HFB) to a habitual diet in free-living men. Twenty-three males (39.9 ± 10.8 years, 177.5 ± 6.7 cm, 97.3 ± 25.0 kg) participated in this double-blind crossover study. Assessment of vascular function and aerobic capacity were measured at entry and in the last week of each intervention and washout period. Participants then completed two 5-week dietary interventions (LFB or HFB; 5 patties/week) in a randomized order with a 4-week washout. Data were analyzed via 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA (

Indexed as

Pulse Wave AnalysisRed MeatAnimalsBlood PressureCattleCross-Over StudiesDiet, Fat-RestrictedHumansMalebeefblood pressurecardiovascular disease riskcarotid–femoral pulse wave velocitycholesteroldietflow-mediated dilationvascular function

Identifiers

PMID36986140

DOI10.3390/nu15061410

PMCPMC10052947

OpenAlexW4324366420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.