Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36985739›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comprehensive Evaluation of End-Point Free Energy Techniques in Carboxylated-Pillar[6]arene Host-Guest Binding: III. Force-Field Comparison, Three-Trajectory Realization and Further Dielectric Augmentation.

Xiao Liu, Lei Zheng, Chu Qin, Yalong Cong, John Z H Zhang, Zhaoxi Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Heterocyclic-Based Analogues against Sarcine-Ricin Loop RNA fromMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024
    Article
  2. Host Dynamics under General-Purpose Force Fields.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiao LiuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Lei ZhengNYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-7198
Chu QinSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China.
Yalong CongSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-811X
John Z H ZhangNYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-1863
Zhaoxi SunCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-7797

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22107063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host-guest binding, despite the relatively simple structural and chemical features of individual components, still poses a challenge in computational modelling. The extreme underperformance of standard end-point methods in host-guest binding makes them practically useless. In the current work, we explore a potentially promising modification of the three-trajectory realization. The alteration couples the binding-induced structural reorganization into free energy estimation and suffers from dramatic fluctuations in internal energies in protein-ligand situations. Fortunately, the relatively small size of host-guest systems minimizes the magnitude of internal fluctuations and makes the three-trajectory realization practically suitable. Due to the incorporation of intra-molecular interactions in free energy estimation, a strong dependence on the force field parameters could be incurred. Thus, a term-specific investigation of transferable GAFF derivatives is presented, and noticeable differences in many aspects are identified between commonly applied GAFF and GAFF2. These force-field differences lead to different dynamic behaviors of the macrocyclic host, which ultimately would influence the end-point sampling and binding thermodynamics. Therefore, the three-trajectory end-point free energy calculations are performed with both GAFF versions. Additionally, due to the noticeable differences between host dynamics under GAFF and GAFF2, we add additional benchmarks of the single-trajectory end-point calculations. When only the ranks of binding affinities are pursued, the three-trajectory realization performs very well, comparable to and even better than the regressed PBSA_E scoring function and the dielectric constant-variable regime. With the GAFF parameter set, the TIP3P water in explicit solvent sampling and either PB or GB implicit solvent model in free energy estimation, the predictive power of the three-trajectory realization in ranking calculations surpasses all existing end-point methods on this dataset. We further combine the three-trajectory realization with another promising modified end-point regime of varying the interior dielectric constant. The combined regime does not incur sizable improvements for ranks and deviations from experiment exhibit non-monotonic variations.

Indexed as

dielectric constantforce fieldhost–guest bindingpillar[n]arenesthree-trajectory realization

Identifiers

PMID36985739
PMCPMC10059726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.