Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36985235›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Microbial Populations in Ruminal Liquid Samples from Young Beefmaster Bulls at Both Extremes of RFI Values.

Nelson Manzanares-Miranda, Jose F Garcia-Mazcorro, Eduardo B Pérez-Medina, Anakaren Vaquera-Vázquez, Alejandro Martínez-Ruiz, Yareellys Ramos-Zayas, Jorge R Kawas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nelson Manzanares-MirandaCentro de Investigación en Producción Agropecuaria (CIPA), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Linares 67700, Mexico.
Jose F Garcia-MazcorroResearch and Development, MNA de Mexico, San Nicolas de los Garza 66477, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6047-4361
Eduardo B Pérez-MedinaResearch and Development, MNA de Mexico, San Nicolas de los Garza 66477, Mexico.
Anakaren Vaquera-VázquezLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Laboratorio Central Regional del Norte (LCRN), Guadalupe 67100, Mexico.
Alejandro Martínez-RuizLaboratorio de Biología Molecular, Laboratorio Central Regional del Norte (LCRN), Guadalupe 67100, Mexico.
Yareellys Ramos-ZayasResearch and Development, MNA de Mexico, San Nicolas de los Garza 66477, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0007-3851
Jorge R KawasPosgrado Conjunto Agronomía-Veterinaria, UANL, General Escobedo 66054, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is involved in the productivity of beef cattle, but the impact of different analysis strategies on microbial composition is unclear. Ruminal samples were obtained from Beefmaster calves (

Indexed as

beef cattlefeed efficiencyresidual feed intakeruminal microbiotaSucciniclasticum

Identifiers

PMID36985235
PMCPMC10055678
OpenAlexW4323318917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.