ArticleMicromachines2023
Detection of In-Plane Movement in Electrically Actuated Microelectromechanical Systems Using a Scanning Electron Microscope.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanosecond, Nanometer Movies of MEMS/NEMS Dynamics in a Standard SEM Using Time-Tagged Secondary Electrons.Small methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The measurement of in-plane motion in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) is a challenge for existing measurement techniques due to the small size of the moving devices and the low amplitude of motion. This paper studied the possibility of using images obtained using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) together with existing motion detection algorithms to characterize the motion of MEMS. SEM imaging has previously been used to detect motion in MEMS device. However, the differences in how SEM imaging and optical imaging capture motion, together with possible interference caused by electrical actuation, create doubts about how accurately motion could be detected in a SEM. In this work, it is shown that existing motion detection algorithms can be used to detect movement with an amplitude of 69 nm. In addition, the properties of SEM images, such as bright edges, complement these algorithms. Electrical actuation was found to cause error in the measurement, however, the error was limited to regions that were electrically connected to the actuating probes and minimal error could be detected in regions that were electrically insulated from the probes. These results show that an SEM is a powerful tool for characterizing low amplitude motion and electrical contacts in MEMS and allow for the detection of motion under 100 nm in amplitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.