Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36985022›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

Innovative Fabrication of Hollow Microneedle Arrays Enabling Blood Sampling with a Self-Powered Microfluidic Patch.

Lorenz Van Hileghem, Shashwat Kushwaha, Agnese Piovesan, Pieter Verboven, Bart Nicolaï, Dominiek Reynaerts, Francesco Dal Dosso, Jeroen Lammertyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Research progress on the manufacturing technology of hollow microneedles].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  5. A Bioinspired and Cost-Effective Device for Minimally Invasive Blood Sampling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lorenz Van HileghemBiosensors Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Shashwat KushwahaInstitute of Micro- and Nanoscale Integration, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Agnese PiovesanPostharvest Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4962-352X
Pieter VerbovenPostharvest Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9542-8285
Bart NicolaïPostharvest Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Dominiek ReynaertsInstitute of Micro- and Nanoscale Integration, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6158-0358
Francesco Dal DossoBiosensors Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen LammertynBiosensors Group, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 42, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8143-6794

Funding

KU Leuven C3/21/014KU Leuven C32/17/007KU Leuven IDN/20/011Research Foundation - Flanders S003923N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneedles are gaining a lot of attention in the context of sampling cutaneous biofluids such as capillary blood. Their minimal invasiveness and user-friendliness make them a prominent substitute for venous puncture or finger-pricking. Although the latter is suitable for self-sampling, the impracticality of manual handling and the difficulty of obtaining enough qualitative sample is driving the search for better solutions. In this context, hollow microneedle arrays (HMNAs) are particularly interesting for completely integrating sample-to-answer solutions as they create a duct between the skin and the sampling device. However, the fabrication of sharp-tipped HMNAs with a high aspect ratio (AR) is challenging, especially since a length of ≥1500 μm is desired to reach the blood capillaries. In this paper, we first described a novel two-step fabrication protocol for HMNAs in stainless steel by percussion laser drilling and subsequent micro-milling. The HMNAs were then integrated into a self-powered microfluidic sampling patch, containing a capillary pump which was optimized to generate negative pressure differences up to 40.9 ± 1.8 kPa. The sampling patch was validated in vitro, showing the feasibility of sampling 40 μL of liquid. It is anticipated that our proof-of-concept is a starting point for more sophisticated all-in-one biofluid sampling and point-of-care testing systems.

Indexed as

biofluid samplinghollow microneedle arrayslaser drillingmicro-millingself-powered microfluidics

Identifiers

PMID36985022
PMCPMC10052199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.