ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Local Antibiotic Delivery Ceramic Bone Substitutes for the Treatment of Infected Bone Cavities and Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review on What We Have Learned from Animal Models.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alb-PRF Hybrid Membranes Functionalized with Carbonated Hydroxyapatite and Doxycycline for Bone Regeneration and Antimicrobial Control: An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Local Antibiotic-Loadable Carriers for the Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- UV-spectrometric study of antibiotic long-term release by different osteoplastic materials used in dentistry.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Calcium phosphate-based anti-infective bone cements: recent trends and future perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Antibiotics release by hybrid bone scaffold: relationship between kinetic profiles and scaffold intrinsic features.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- An Overview on the Big Players in Bone Tissue Engineering: Biomaterials, Scaffolds and Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advances in magnesium-containing bioceramics for bone repair.Biomaterials translational · 2024Review
- Article
- PLLA Coating of Lyophilized Human Bone Allograft for Long-term Release of Antibiotics.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsthe focus of this study is to evaluate if the combination of an antibiotic with a ceramic biomaterial is effective in treating osteomyelitis in an infected animal model and to define which model and protocol are best suited for in vivo experiments of local bone infection treatment.
methodsa systematic review was carried out based on PRISMA statement guidelines. A PubMed search was conducted to find original papers on animal models of bone infections using local antibiotic delivery systems with the characteristics of bone substitutes. Articles without a control group, differing from the experimental group only by the addition of antibiotics to the bone substitute, were excluded.
resultsa total of 1185 records were retrieved, and after a three-step selection, 34 papers were included. Six manuscripts studied the effect of antibiotic-loaded biomaterials on bone infection prevention. Five articles studied infection in the presence of foreign bodies. In all but one, the combination of an antibiotic with bioceramic bone substitutes tended to prevent or cure bone infection while promoting biomaterial osteointegration.
conclusionsthis systematic review shows that the combination of antibiotics with bioceramic bone substitutes may be appropriate to treat bone infection when applied locally. The variability of the animal models, time to develop an infection, antibiotic used, way of carrying and releasing antibiotics, type of ceramic material, and endpoints limits the conclusions on the ideal therapy, enhancing the need for consistent models and guidelines to develop an adequate combination of material and antimicrobial agent leading to an effective human application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.