Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983955›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Oncologists' Knowledge, Practice and Attitude toward Fertility Preservation: A National Survey.

Ahmed Al Ghaithi, Eyas Al Rashdi, Maryam Al Shukri, Rahma Al Ghabshi, Halima Albalushi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Perceived Versus Demonstrated Oncofertility Knowledge Among Oncology Providers.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Oncologists' current perspective and barriers to men's fertility preservation: a nationwide study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed Al GhaithiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman.
Eyas Al RashdiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman.
Maryam Al ShukriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat 123, Oman.
Rahma Al GhabshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Hospital 111, Muscat 123, Oman.
Halima AlbalushiDepartment of Human and Clinical Anatomy, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman.ORCID 0000-0001-5289-0445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment protocols, fortunately, increased the rates of cancer survivors over the years. However, these treatments may result in infertility or subfertility. Oncologists are considered the gateway for knowledge about cancer and its treatments' effects. Several studies showed that many oncologists do not discuss fertility preservation with their patients. This study aimed to explore the perspective of oncologists in Oman on fertility preservation.

methodsA cross-sectional study of physicians and surgeons dealing with patients with cancer was conducted from June 2021 to December 2021. A standardized and validated questionnaire was used to collect data.

resultsParticipants reported that they are knowledgeable about sperm cryopreservation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists use but not other methods of fertility preservation. About 94% of the participants reported that they need more knowledge about fertility preservation. More than half of the participants had never encountered cancer patients who used ovarian cryopreservation, testicular tissue cryopreservation, in vitro fertilization with embryo cryopreservation and oocyte cryopreservation. The majority (78%) agreed that discussing fertility preservation with newly diagnosed cancer patients is a high priority.

conclusionsOncologists in Oman are supportive of fertility preservation. The lack of knowledge and unavailability of well-structured fertility preservation services in Oman hinders the initiation of fertility preservation discussions.

Indexed as

cancercarefertilityfertility preservationoncofertilityoncologistssurvivors

Identifiers

PMID36983955
PMCPMC10054663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.