Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983877›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Mechanism of Chiral-Selective Aminoacylation of an RNA Minihelix Explored by QM/MM Free-Energy Simulations.

Tadashi Ando, Koji Tamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tadashi AndoDepartment of Applied Electronics, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1 Niijuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-8585, Japan.
Koji TamuraResearch Institute for Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 2641 Yamazaki, Noda, Chiba 278-8510, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K06592, 21K06293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aminoacylation of a primordial RNA minihelix composed of D-ribose shows L-amino acid preference over D-amino acid without any ribozymes or enzymes. This preference in the amino acylation reaction likely plays an important role in the establishment of homochirality in L-amino acid in modern proteins. However, molecular mechanisms of the chiral selective reaction remain unsolved mainly because of difficulty in direct observation of the reaction at the molecular scale by experiments. For seeking a possible mechanism of the chiral selectivity, quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) umbrella sampling molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the aminoacylation reactions in a modeled RNA were performed to investigate differences in their free-energy profiles along the reactions for L- and D-alanine and its physicochemical origin. The reaction is initiated by approaching a 3'-oxygen of the RNA minihelix to the carbonyl carbon of an aminoacyl phosphate oligonucleotide. The QM/MM umbrella sampling MD calculations showed that the height of the free-energy barrier for L-alanine aminoacylation reaction was 17 kcal/mol, which was 9 kcal/mol lower than that for the D-alanine system. At the transition state, the distance between the negatively charged 5'-phosphate and the positively charged amino group of L-alanine was shorter than that of D-alanine, which was caused by the chirality difference of the amino acid. These results indicate that the transition state for L-alanine is more electrostatically stabilized than that for D-alanine, which would be a plausible mechanism previously unexplained for chiral selectivity in the RNA minihelix aminoacylation.

Indexed as

aminoacylationhomochirality of amino acidsMDQM/MMRNA

Identifiers

PMID36983877
PMCPMC10057131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.