Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983756›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Prognostic Significance of Systemic Inflammation Markers in Testicular and Penile Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Literature.

Aleksandar Janicic, Milos Petrovic, Milica Zekovic, Nenad Vasilic, Vesna Coric, Bogomir Milojevic, Marko Zivkovic, Uros Bumbasirevic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epigenetic Factors and ncRNAs in Testicular Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandar JanicicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milos PetrovicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9490-1197
Milica ZekovicCentre of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-3426
Nenad VasilicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Vesna CoricInstitute of Medical and Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0227-821X
Bogomir MilojevicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6784-8389
Marko ZivkovicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Uros BumbasirevicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0367-2745
University of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contemporary clinical practice, biomarkers are indispensable in the assessment and management of oncological patients. Although established serum tumor markers (beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG), alpha fetoprotein (AFP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)) have an indisputably important role in the management of patients with testicular cancer (TC), the application of these tumor markers may be accompanied with certain limitations, implying the need for additional biomarkers. Contrary to TC, there is a lack of established serological biomarkers for penile cancer (PC) and the management of this urological malignancy is based on multiple clinicopathological parameters. Therefore, the identification and rigorous analytical and clinical validation of reliable biomarkers are considered pivotal for improving PC management. Inflammation may be associated with all stages of oncogenesis, from initial neoplastic transformation to angiogenesis, tissue invasion, and metastasis. Accordingly, an array of inflammation-related indices have gained increasing attention as emerging predictors of oncological outcomes. The clinical usefulness of systemic inflammation markers was reported in many urological and non-urological malignancies. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize current scientific data regarding the prognostic and predictive significance of systemic inflammation markers in TC and PC patients.

Indexed as

inflammationpenile cancerprognostic biomarkerstesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID36983756
PMCPMC10054741
OpenAlexW4321500144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.