Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983619›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

The Usefulness of Motor Potentials Evoked Transvertebrally at Lumbar Levels for the Evaluation of Peroneal Nerve Regeneration after Experimental Repair in Rats.

Piotr Czarnecki, Juliusz Huber, Agnieszka Szukała, Michał Górecki, Leszek Romanowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Promise of Personalized Peripheral Nerve Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. End-to-Side vs. Free Graft Nerve Reconstruction-Experimental Study on Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr CzarneckiDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Street, no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-8139
Juliusz HuberDepartment of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Street, no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-0497
Agnieszka SzukałaDepartment of Pathophysiology of Locomotor Organs, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Street, no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-0988
Michał GóreckiDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Street, no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9902-0770
Leszek RomanowskiDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Hand Surgery, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, 28 Czerwca 1956 r. Street, no. 135/147, 61-545 Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are used in neurology as part of a precise diagnostic method to study the transmission of efferent neural impulses at the central and peripheral levels of the nervous system. Previous attempts have been made to apply MEPs in animal studies for evaluating neural transmission at the motor cortex center level to the muscles of the forelimbs and hindlimbs. In clinical and experimental studies, little attention is focused on the significance of the magnetic stimulation of spinal cord structures with the direct recording of the evoked potentials from peripheral nerve motor fibers. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the usefulness of the motor potentials evoked transvertebrally at lumbar levels in the evaluation of experimental peroneal nerve regeneration in rats. The bilateral transmission of efferent impulses in the distal parts of the peroneal and tibial nerves was verified by recordings of evoked potentials following transvertebral magnetic stimulation at lumbar levels (MEPs) and the electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve in classical electroneurographic (ENG) tests for comparison. Recordings were performed 24 weeks after grafts on surgically treated hindlimbs as well as on non-operated hindlimbs as controls. Both the MEP and ENG stimulations resulted in evoked potentials with larger amplitude values following the application of the magnetic pulses, with more being recorded on the non-operated hindlimbs than on the operated ones when recordings were taken from peroneal nerve branches. We observed statistically significant correlations between the MEP and ENG results for peroneal and tibial nerve amplitude on the non-operated side and peroneal nerve amplitude on the operated side. The recorded latencies of the evoked potentials were shorter in the ENG studies than in the MEPs for the non-operated side. The results demonstrated the phenomenon of regeneration in the motor fibers of the peroneal nerves 24 weeks after grafting in the experimental conditions. In this study, the MEPs were as useful as the ENG studies for evaluating regeneration in the motor fibers of hindlimb nerves in rats, although they were not significantly different. This paper discusses the clinical importance of transvertebral MEPs induced at the lumbosacral and cervical levels with a magnetic field for the diagnostic evaluation of efferent impulse transmission at different levels of the motor pathway.

Indexed as

electroneurographylumbar transvertebral stimulationmotor evoked potentialsnerve neural transmission assessmentnerve reconstructionrat peroneal nerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36983619
PMCPMC10054717
OpenAlexW4322630709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.