ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023
Patient Specific Instruments and Patient Individual Implants-A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precision medicine in orthopaedics: A review of current technologies and future directions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Patient-specific instrumentation in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Fully automated workflow for designing patient-specific orthopaedic implants: Application to total knee arthroplasty.PloS one · 2025Article
- 3D-printed hip prostheses with regenerative integration: a state-of-the-art comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Review
- Advancing Diagnostic Techniques for Implant-Related Infections: the Synergistic Effect of Sonication and Dithiothreitol.Maedica · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing bone tumor management: cutting-edge breakthroughs in limb-saving treatments.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Review
- Role of Dithiothreitol in Detection of Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Infections.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Validating a Novel 2D to 3D Knee Reconstruction Method on Preoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Patient Anatomies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joint arthroplasties are one of the most frequently performed standard operations worldwide. Patient individual instruments and patient individual implants represent an innovation that must prove its usefulness in further studies. However, promising results are emerging. Those implants seem to be a benefit especially in revision situations. Most experience is available in the field of knee and hip arthroplasty. Patient-specific instruments for the shoulder and upper ankle are much less common. Patient individual implants combine individual cutting blocks and implants, while patient individual instruments solely use individual cutting blocks in combination with off-the-shelf implants. This review summarizes the current data regarding the implantation of individual implants and the use of individual instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.