Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983603›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Age and Sex-Related Effects on Single-Subject Gray Matter Networks in Healthy Participants.

Yoko Shigemoto, Noriko Sato, Norihide Maikusa, Daichi Sone, Miho Ota, Yukio Kimura, Emiko Chiba, Kyoji Okita, Tensho Yamao, Moto Nakaya and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yoko ShigemotoDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Noriko SatoDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Norihide MaikusaCenter for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-4684
Daichi SoneDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-706X
Miho OtaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan.
Yukio KimuraDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Emiko ChibaDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-5217
Kyoji OkitaDepartment of Drug Dependence Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Tensho YamaoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-8516, Japan.
Moto NakayaDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-6286
Hiroyuki MakiDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Elly ArizonoDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsudaDepartment of Radiology, National Center Hospital, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPFukushima Medical University · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPJuntendo University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) no.19K17157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments in image analysis have enabled an individual's brain network to be evaluated and brain age to be predicted from gray matter images. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of age and sex on single-subject gray matter networks using a large sample of healthy participants. We recruited 812 healthy individuals (59.3 ± 14.0 years, 407 females, and 405 males) who underwent three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Similarity-based gray matter networks were constructed, and the following network properties were calculated: normalized clustering, normalized path length, and small-world coefficients. The predicted brain age was computed using a support-vector regression model. We evaluated the network alterations related to age and sex. Additionally, we examined the correlations between the network properties and predicted brain age and compared them with the correlations between the network properties and chronological age. The brain network retained efficient small-world properties regardless of age; however, reduced small-world properties were observed with advancing age. Although women exhibited higher network properties than men and similar age-related network declines as men in the subjects aged < 70 years, faster age-related network declines were observed in women, leading to no differences in sex among the participants aged ≥ 70 years. Brain age correlated well with network properties compared to chronological age in participants aged ≥ 70 years. Although the brain network retained small-world properties, it moved towards randomized networks with aging. Faster age-related network disruptions in women were observed than in men among the elderly. Our findings provide new insights into network alterations underlying aging.

Indexed as

aginggray mattermagnetic resonance imagingnetworksex

Identifiers

PMID36983603
PMCPMC10057933
OpenAlexW4322500790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.