Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983596›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

Does Electrical Stimulation through Nerve Conduits Improve Peripheral Nerve Regeneration?-A Systematic Review.

Sophie Hasiba-Pappas, Lars-P Kamolz, Hanna Luze, Sebastian P Nischwitz, Judith C J Holzer-Geissler, Alexandru Cristian Tuca, Theresa Rienmüller, Mathias Polz, Daniel Ziesel, Raimund Winter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sophie Hasiba-PappasResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
Lars-P KamolzResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-876X
Hanna LuzeResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-0831
Sebastian P NischwitzResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6621-4891
Judith C J Holzer-GeisslerResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-2817
Alexandru Cristian TucaResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.
Theresa RienmüllerEuropean Testing Center of Medical Devices, Institute of Health Care Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/II, A-8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-106X
Mathias PolzEuropean Testing Center of Medical Devices, Institute of Health Care Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/II, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Daniel ZieselEuropean Testing Center of Medical Devices, Institute of Health Care Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/II, A-8010 Graz, Austria.
Raimund WinterResearch Unit for Tissue Regeneration, Repair and Reconstruction, Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 5, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral nerve injuries affect over 2% of trauma patients and can lead to severe functional impairment and permanent disability. Autologous nerve transplantation is still the gold standard in the reconstruction of nerve defects. For small defects, conduits can be considered for bridging. Lately, the combined use of conduits and electrical stimulation has gained attention in the treatment of peripheral nerve injury. This review aimed to present the currently available data on this topic.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on electrical stimulation through nerve conduits for nerve defects in in vivo studies.

resultsFifteen studies fit the inclusion criteria. All of them reported on the application of nerve conduits combined with stimulation for sciatic nerve gaps in rats. Functional, electrophysiological and histological evaluations showed improved nerve regeneration after electrical stimulation. High variation was observed in the treatment protocols.

conclusionElectrically stimulated conduits could improve peripheral nerve regeneration in rat models. The combined application of nerve guidance conduits and electrical stimulation shows promising results and should be further evaluated under standardized conditions.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationnerve conduitnerve regenerationperipheral nerve injuryplastic surgerysciatic nerve

Identifiers

PMID36983596
PMCPMC10057314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.