ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Japanese Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Comparison with Takayasu Arteritis.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA) are distinct types of large-vessel vasculitis; however, the clinical features of the diseases have some similarities. Limited data are available regarding Japanese patients with GCA and TA. The present study aimed to compare the clinical features and outcomes of Japanese patients with GCA and TA and the effects of large vessel involvement (LVI).
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of the patients with GCA (
resultsThe median age of onset was significantly higher in the GCA group at 24 years (range, 16-72 years) in the TA group and 77 years (range, 57-89 years) in the GCA group (
conclusionsOur study demonstrated no significant difference in the survival rates of Japanese patients with GCA and TA. The relapse-free survival rates were significantly higher in the GCA group than in the TA group. LVI may not be associated with disease relapse or survival rate in Japanese patients with GCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.