Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983409›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Nivolumab or Atezolizumab in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Prognostic Index Based on Data from Daily Practice.

Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska, Sylwia Tabor, Aleksandra Piórek, Adam Płużański, Kinga Winiarczyk, Magdalena Zaborowska-Szmit, Katarzyna Zajda, Dariusz M Kowalski, Maciej Krzakowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena Knetki-WróblewskaDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7603-099X
Sylwia TaborDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra PiórekDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-1772
Adam PłużańskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-6445
Kinga WiniarczykDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena Zaborowska-SzmitDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8725-7698
Katarzyna ZajdaDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz M KowalskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-3229
Maciej KrzakowskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, The Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of nivolumab and atezolizumab in advanced pre-treated NSCLC was documented in prospective trials. We aim to confirm the benefits and indicate predictive factors for immunotherapy in daily practice.

methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis. The median PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression method.

resultsA total of 260 patients (ECOG 0-1) with advanced NSCLC (CS III-IV) were eligible to receive nivolumab or atezolizumab as second-line treatment. Median PFS and OS were three months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-3.42) and 10 months (95% CI 8.03-11.96), respectively, for the overall population. The median OS for the atezolizumab arm was eight months (95% CI 5.89-10.1), while for the nivolumab group, it was 14 months (95% CI 10.02-17.97) (

conclusionsNivolumab and atezolizumab provided clinical benefit in real life. Clinical and laboratory factors may help to identify subgroups likely to benefit. The use of prognostic indices may be valuable in clinical practice.

Indexed as

atezolizumabimmunotherapynivolumabNSCLCprognostic index

Identifiers

PMID36983409
PMCPMC10053214
OpenAlexW4328122275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.