Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983363›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Reintervention of Residual Aortic Dissection after Type A Aortic Repair: Results of a Prospective Follow-Up at 5 Years.

Alizée Porto, Virgile Omnes, Michel A Bartoli, Ron Azogui, Noémie Resseguier, Mariangela De Masi, Laurence Bal, Laura Imbert, Nicolas Jaussaud, Pierre Morera and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical study of reoperation for acute type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alizée PortoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Virgile OmnesDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Michel A BartoliDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Ron AzoguiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Noémie ResseguierDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health Cost, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Mariangela De MasiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-8112
Laurence BalDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Laura ImbertDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health Cost, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Nicolas JaussaudDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Pierre MoreraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Alexis JacquierDepartment of Radiology, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Pierre-Antoine BarralDepartment of Radiology, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Vlad GariboldiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Marine GaudryDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Timone Aortic Center, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background After a type A aortic dissection repair, a patent false lumen in the descending aorta is the most common situation encountered, and is a well-known risk factor for aortic growth, reinterventions and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of residual aortic dissection (RAD) at a high-volume aortic center with prospective follow-up. Methods In this prospective single-center study, all patients operated for type A aortic dissection between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. Patients without postoperative computed tomography scans or during follow-up at our center, and patients without RAD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up for patients with RAD. The secondary endpoints were perioperative mortality, rate of distal aneurysmal evolution, location of distal aneurysmal evolution, rate of distal reinterventions, outcomes of distal reinterventions, and aortic-related death during follow-up. Results In total, 200 survivors of RAD comprised the study group. After a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (1-66), eight patients (4.0%) died and 107 (53.5%) had an aneurysmal progression. The rate of distal reintervention was 19.5% (39/200), for malperfusion syndrome in seven cases (3.5%) and aneurysmal evolution in 32 cases (16.0%). Most reinterventions occurred during the first 2 years (82.1%). Twenty-seven patients were treated for an aneurysmal evolution of RAD including aortic arch with hybrid repair in 21 cases and branched aortic arch endoprosthesis in six cases. In the hybrid repair group, there was no death, and the rate of morbidity was 28.6% (6/21) (one minor stroke, one pulmonary complication, one recurrent paralysis with complete recovery and three major bleeding events). In the branched endograft group, there was no death, no stroke, and no paraplegia. There was one case (16.7%) of carotid dissection. Complete aortic remodeling or complete FL thrombosis on the thoracic aorta was found in 18 cases (85.7%) and in five cases (83.3%) in the hybrid and branched endograft groups, respectively. Conclusions: Despite a critical course in most cases of RAD, with a high rate of aneurysmal evolution and reintervention, the long-term mortality rate remains low with a close follow-up and a multidisciplinary management in an expert center.

Indexed as

branched aortic arch endografthybrid repairlong-term resultsreinterventionresidual aortic dissectiontype A repair

Identifiers

PMID36983363
PMCPMC10054589
OpenAlexW4327963441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.