ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Reintervention of Residual Aortic Dissection after Type A Aortic Repair: Results of a Prospective Follow-Up at 5 Years.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repair of residual aortic dissection after type a aortic dissection repair: a systematic review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Unpredictable Aortic Behavior in Identifying Risk Factors for Reintervention: A Prospective Cohort Study.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2025Observational
- Reoperative arch-first total arch repair after previous acute type A aortic dissection repair.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Novel Indexes in the Assessment of Cardiac Enlargement Using Chest Radiography: A New Look at an Old Problem.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Medium and long-term aortic remodeling following aortic valve replacement combined with anticoagulation for DeBakey I aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes in thoracic aortic surgery: 11 year single centre experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Challenges and Innovations in Postoperative Care for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: The Role of Structured Surveillance and Virtual Wards.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Long-Term Results and Quality of Life after Surgery for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A: Contemporary Single-Centre Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Quality of Life after Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery in the United Kingdom: The QUADS Study.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2024Article
- Aortic elastic fiber degeneration during acute type a aortic dissection and reverse aortic remodeling.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical study of reoperation for acute type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Aortopathy in pregnancy: Unanswered questions.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background After a type A aortic dissection repair, a patent false lumen in the descending aorta is the most common situation encountered, and is a well-known risk factor for aortic growth, reinterventions and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term results of residual aortic dissection (RAD) at a high-volume aortic center with prospective follow-up. Methods In this prospective single-center study, all patients operated for type A aortic dissection between January 2017 and December 2022 were included. Patients without postoperative computed tomography scans or during follow-up at our center, and patients without RAD were excluded. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during follow-up for patients with RAD. The secondary endpoints were perioperative mortality, rate of distal aneurysmal evolution, location of distal aneurysmal evolution, rate of distal reinterventions, outcomes of distal reinterventions, and aortic-related death during follow-up. Results In total, 200 survivors of RAD comprised the study group. After a mean follow-up of 27.2 months (1-66), eight patients (4.0%) died and 107 (53.5%) had an aneurysmal progression. The rate of distal reintervention was 19.5% (39/200), for malperfusion syndrome in seven cases (3.5%) and aneurysmal evolution in 32 cases (16.0%). Most reinterventions occurred during the first 2 years (82.1%). Twenty-seven patients were treated for an aneurysmal evolution of RAD including aortic arch with hybrid repair in 21 cases and branched aortic arch endoprosthesis in six cases. In the hybrid repair group, there was no death, and the rate of morbidity was 28.6% (6/21) (one minor stroke, one pulmonary complication, one recurrent paralysis with complete recovery and three major bleeding events). In the branched endograft group, there was no death, no stroke, and no paraplegia. There was one case (16.7%) of carotid dissection. Complete aortic remodeling or complete FL thrombosis on the thoracic aorta was found in 18 cases (85.7%) and in five cases (83.3%) in the hybrid and branched endograft groups, respectively. Conclusions: Despite a critical course in most cases of RAD, with a high rate of aneurysmal evolution and reintervention, the long-term mortality rate remains low with a close follow-up and a multidisciplinary management in an expert center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.