Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983343›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Comparison between FlowTrac and Pulmonary Arterial Catheter in Off-Pump Cardiac Surgery Patients: "Why Did We Miss Our Appointment?". Comment on Oh et al. Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Luigi Vetrugno, Federico Barbariol, Cristian Deana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luigi VetrugnoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-8368
Federico BarbariolAnesthesia and Intensive Care 1, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Health Integrated Agency of Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Cristian DeanaAnesthesia and Intensive Care 1, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Health Integrated Agency of Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-3177
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We read with great interest the study by Chahyun Oh et al., which compared estimates of cardiac output (CO) provided by the FloTrac system (CO-FloTrac) with those obtained with continuous thermodilution (COcont) after time adjustments using continuous recordings of intraoperative physiological datal [...].

Identifiers

PMID36983343
PMCPMC10056149
OpenAlexW4327739836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.