Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983329›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Exploratory Study of Associations and Agreement between Prognostic Patient-Registered Factors, Physiotherapists' Intuitive Synthesis, and Patient-Reported Factors in Whiplash-Associated Disorders.

Rob A B Oostendorp, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters, Jan Mulder, Emiel Van Trijffel, Geert M Rutten, Margot De Kooning, Marjan Laekeman, Nathalie Roussel, Jo Nijs, J W Hans Elvers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rob A B OostendorpScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6697-0817
Gwendolyne G M Scholten-PeetersAmsterdam Movement Sciences Program Musculoskeletal Health, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-9554
Jan MulderScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Emiel Van TrijffelZiekenhuisgroep Twente, ZGT Academy, 7609 Almelo, The Netherlands.
Geert M RuttenResearch Program of Organization of Healthcare and Social Services, School of Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Science, 6826 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Margot De KooningPain in Motion International Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-7400
Marjan LaekemanDepartment of Physiological Psychology, Otto-Friedrich University of Bamberg, 96047 Bamberg, Germany.
Nathalie RousselDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7409-878X
Jo NijsPain in Motion International Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4976-6563
J W Hans ElversDepartment of Public Health and Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BERadboud University Nijmegen · NLHAN University of Applied Sciences · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Bamberg · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large proportion of people who sustain a whiplash injury will have persistent pain, disability, and participation problems. Several prognostic factors for functional recovery have been reported in the literature but these factors are often evaluated based on differing implementations in clinical practice. Additionally, physiotherapists also rely on their clinical intuition to estimate the functional prognosis of their patients, but this is seldom measured in experimental research. Furthermore, no study to date has explored the associations between clinical intuition, clinically estimated factors, and objectively measured factors for functional recovery of patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders (WAD).

aimThe aim of this exploratory study is to evaluate associations between prognostic factors for functional recovery, based on routinely collected data in a specialized primary care physiotherapy practice in a consecutive sample of patients (n = 523) with WAD.

methodsThree sources of prognostic factors were selected: (1) physiotherapists' synthesis of clinical intuition in terms of high-risk, inconclusive risk, or low-risk for functional recovery, (2) patient-registered factors from history taking, and (3) patient-reported prognostic factors derived from questionnaires. Prognostic factors were selected based on the literature, recommendations in Dutch clinical practice guidelines, and consensus between experts. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated to explore the associations between sources of prognostic factors, using a cutoff ≥0.25 for acceptable association.

resultsAssociations between physiotherapists' intuitive synthesis and patient-registered variables were substantial (

conclusionWhen estimating prognosis for functional recovery using clinical reasoning, physiotherapists should integrate patients' registered experience of their course of recovery, as well as the timeline after an accident, with their own synthesis of clinical intuition regarding prognostic factors in patients with WAD.

Indexed as

clinical intuitionclinical reasoningfunctional recoveryprognosisprognostic factorsroutinely collected datawhiplash associated disorders

Identifiers

PMID36983329
PMCPMC10051901
OpenAlexW4327730801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.