Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983259›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Artificial Liver Support with CytoSorb and MARS in Liver Failure: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Analysis.

Mihai Popescu, Corina David, Alexandra Marcu, Mihaela Roxana Olita, Mariana Mihaila, Dana Tomescu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06079021 (COOLEY- Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06079021 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

COOLEY- Study: aCute On chrOnic Liver failurE Using the cYtosorb Device

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsAcute-On-Chronic Liver Failure, Anticoagulant Adverse Reaction, Sarcopenia, UltrasonographyArmsCytoSorb
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Feasibility and Safety of Cytosorb Application in Patients With Acute Liver Failure.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The international, prospective CytOSorbJournal of intensive medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Challenges in the use of the CytoSorbJournal of medical case reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mihai PopescuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2947-335X
Corina DavidDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandra MarcuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela Roxana OlitaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Mariana MihailaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.
Dana TomescuDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 022328 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver failure represents a life-threatening organ dysfunction with liver transplantation as the only proven curable therapy to date. Liver assist devices have been extensively researched to either bridge such patients to transplantation or promote spontaneous recovery. The aim of our study was to compare two such devices, the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) and CytoSorb, in patients with liver failure.

methodsWe retrospectively included 15 patients who underwent MARS during their intensive care unit stay and matched them to 15 patients who underwent hemoadsorption using CytoSorb. Clinical and paraclinical data obtained after each individual session, after the course of treatment, as well as at the end of the intensive care unit stay were compared between the two groups.

resultsSingle sessions of CytoSorb and MARS were both associated with a significant decrease in bilirubin (

conclusionIn conclusion, our results show a potential benefit of CytoSorb in rebalancing liver functional tests in patients with liver failure compared to MARS but the exact effects on patient outcome, including hospital length of stay and survival, should be further investigated in randomized control trials.

Indexed as

acute liver failureacute-on-chronic liver failureartificial liver supportCytoSorbliver support therapymolecular adsorbent recirculating system

Identifiers

PMID36983259
PMCPMC10058971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.