ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
A Comparison of
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breath-Based Diagnostics in Liver Diseases: Dynamic Assessment of Hepatic Metabolic Reserve and Liver Fibrosis.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Bridging current knowledge gap: better primary colorectal cancer prevention in people living with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a wide-spread liver disease, only some patients progress towards steatohepatitis and cirrhosis.
aimWe comparatively analyzed the methacetin breath test (MBT) for the microsomal function of the liver and the octanoate breath test (OBT) for mitochondrial activity, in detecting patients with steatohepatitis and estimating fibrosis.
methods81 patients with histologically proven NAFLD (SAF score) were evaluated. The parameters used for both breath tests were the dose/h and the cumulative dose recovery at multiple timepoints. The statistical association between histological diagnosis and breath test results used Independent Samples
resultsBoth MBT and OBT were able to differentiate patients with simple steatosis from NASH and to stratify patients with significant fibrosis and cirrhosis (
conclusionsBoth MBR and OBT tests are potentially useful tools in assessing patients with NAFLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.