ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Comparative Study of Dental Custom CAD-CAM Implant Abutments and Dental Implant Stock Abutments.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parameters Influencing Fracture Strength in Implant-Supported Zirconia Restorations: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Defining the influence of digitalization on the future of dentistry through an educational handbook for Computer Aided Design tool training.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Influence of Design Parameters on Implant Abutment Performance: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Customized CAD/CAM vs. Stock Titanium Abutments for Immediate Implant Placement in Class II Extraction Sockets: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Examination of Various Abutment Designs Behavior Depending on Load Using Finite Element Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Microscopy Evaluation of Emergence Profile Surfaces of Dental Custom CAD-CAM Implant Abutments and Dental Implant Stock Abutments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- The effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
- Quantification and Influence of IL-1β on Pain and Inflammatory Response after Placement of a Cement-Screw-Retained Restoration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Efficacy Analysis of the Personalization of Prosthetic Abutments in Implant Supported Restorations in Comparison to Available Standard Titanium Abutments.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical outcome of narrow diameter dental implants: a 3-year retrospective study.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
- CAD/CAM Abutments in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Soft Tissue Stability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The implementation of CAD-CAM systems in dentistry has significantly influenced the evolution of dental implantology and implant-supported prosthetics within the past three decades. Implant-supported prostheses are comfortable and aesthetic. The prosthetic abutment has also faced a rapid design evolution, from the individualization of standard stock abutments offered by various manufacturers to a modern customization process using CAD-CAM technology. This paper presents a comparative study between 20 dental custom CAD-CAM implant abutments and 20 dental implant stock abutments, based on a set of measurements performed on the digital casts obtained from 24 cases of prosthetic rehabilitation on implants. The statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney U test) revealed significant differences between these two types of abutments: the incisal margin line diameter dimensions for custom abutments were significantly improved compared to standard abutments at the cervical level (U = 343.00, z = 3.868,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.