Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36983001›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

A Systematic Review on the Risk Modulators of Myocardial Infarction in the "Young"-Implications of Lipoprotein (a).

Cristian Stătescu, Larisa Anghel, Laura-Cătălina Benchea, Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi, Andreea Leonte, Alexandra Zăvoi, Ioana Mădălina Zota, Cristina Prisacariu, Rodica Radu, Ionela-Lăcrămioara Șerban and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristian StătescuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-4561
Larisa AnghelInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Laura-Cătălina BencheaInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Bogdan-Sorin TudurachiInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7687-8624
Andreea LeonteCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I. M. Georgescu", 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-6775-0287
Alexandra ZăvoiCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I. M. Georgescu", 700503 Iași, Romania.
Ioana Mădălina ZotaInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4053-4130
Cristina PrisacariuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Rodica RaduInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Ionela-Lăcrămioara ȘerbanPhysiology Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Radu Andy SascăuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInfectious Diseases Institute · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of a myocardial infarction at a younger age is of special interest, considering the psychological and socioeconomic impact, as well as long-term morbidity and mortality. However, this group has a unique risk profile, with less traditional cardiovascular risk factors that are not well studied. This systematic review aims to evaluate traditional risk factors of myocardial infarction in the "young", highlighting the clinical implications of lipoprotein (a). We performed a comprehensive search using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards; we systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct Scopus databases, using the terms: "myocardial infarction", "young", "lipoprotein (a)", "low-density lipoprotein", "risk factors". The search identified 334 articles which were screened, and, at the end, 9 original research articles regarding the implications of lipoprotein (a) in myocardial infarction in the "young" were included in the qualitative synthesis. Elevated lipoprotein (a) levels were independently associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, especially in young patients, where this risk increased by threefold. Thus, it is recommended to measure the lipoprotein (a) levels in individuals with suspected familial hypercholesterolaemia or with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and no other identifiable risk factors, in order to identify patients who might benefit from a more intensive therapeutic approach and follow-up.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIMyocardial InfarctionHumansLipoprotein(a)Risk FactorsLipoprotein(a)acute myocardial infarctionlipoprotein (a)low-density lipoproteinrisk factors“young” patients

Identifiers

PMID36983001
PMCPMC10051886
OpenAlexW4328121675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.