Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36982814›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Induced Coma, Death, and Organ Transplantation: A Physiologic, Genetic, and Theological Perspective.

Cezar-Ivan Coliță, Denissa-Greta Olaru, Daniela Coliță, Dirk M Hermann, Eugen Coliță, Daniela Glavan, Aurel Popa-Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cezar-Ivan ColițăDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020276 Bucharest, Romania.
Denissa-Greta OlaruDepartment of Psychiatry, University for Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Daniela ColițăDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020276 Bucharest, Romania.
Dirk M HermannChair of Vascular Neurology, Dementia and Ageing, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Eugen ColițăDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 020276 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniela GlavanDepartment of Psychiatry, University for Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Aurel Popa-WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry, University for Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-8605
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROEssen University Hospital · DE

Funding

Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii 136/2020Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii 192/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the clinic, the death certificate is issued if brain electrical activity is no longer detectable. However, recent research has shown that in model organisms and humans, gene activity continues for at least 96 h postmortem. The discovery that many genes are still working up to 48 h after death questions our definition of death and has implications for organ transplants and forensics. If genes can be active up to 48 h after death, is the person technically still alive at that point? We discovered a very interesting parallel between genes that were upregulated in the brain after death and genes upregulated in the brains that were subjected to medically-induced coma, including transcripts involved in neurotransmission, proteasomal degradation, apoptosis, inflammation, and most interestingly, cancer. Since these genes are involved in cellular proliferation, their activation after death could represent the cellular reaction to escape mortality and raises the question of organ viability and genetics used for transplantation after death. One factor limiting the organ availability for transplantation is religious belief. However, more recently, organ donation for the benefit of humans in need has been seen as "posthumous giving of organs and tissues can be a manifestation of love spreading also to the other side of death".

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAutopsyBrainComaHumansTissue Donorsapoptosiscancercellular proliferationdeathgeneticsorgan transplantationproteasomal degradationtheology

Identifiers

PMID36982814
PMCPMC10059721
OpenAlexW4327736864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.