Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36982772›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

High Resolution and Automatable Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Using In Situ Telomere and Centromere Hybridization for the Accurate Detection of DNA Damage: An Overview.

Radhia M'Kacher, Bruno Colicchio, Steffen Junker, Elie El Maalouf, Leonhard Heidingsfelder, Andreas Plesch, Alain Dieterlen, Eric Jeandidier, Patrice Carde, Philippe Voisin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Radhia M'KacherCell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France.
Bruno ColicchioIRIMAS, Institut de Recherche en Informatique, Mathématiques, Automatique et Signal, Université de Haute-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-8631
Steffen JunkerInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Elie El MaaloufCell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France.
Leonhard HeidingsfelderMetaSystems GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 6, D-68804 Altlussheim, Germany.
Andreas PleschMetaSystems GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 6, D-68804 Altlussheim, Germany.
Alain DieterlenIRIMAS, Institut de Recherche en Informatique, Mathématiques, Automatique et Signal, Université de Haute-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France.
Eric JeandidierLaboratoire de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier de la Région de Mulhouse Sud-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2757-0770
Patrice CardeDepartment of Hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94804 Villejuif, France.
Philippe VoisinCell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France.
Genopole (France) · FRRobert Bosch (Germany) · DEUniversité de Haute-Alsace · FRAarhus University · DKGroupe Hospitalier de la Région de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the event of a radiological or nuclear accident, or when physical dosimetry is not available, the scoring of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes constitutes an essential tool for the estimation of the absorbed dose of the exposed individual and for effective triage. Cytogenetic biodosimetry employs different cytogenetic assays including the scoring of dicentrics, micronuclei, and translocations as well as analyses of induced premature chromosome condensation to define the frequency of chromosome aberrations. However, inherent challenges using these techniques include the considerable time span from sampling to result, the sensitivity and specificity of the various techniques, and the requirement of highly skilled personnel. Thus, techniques that obviate these challenges are needed. The introduction of telomere and centromere (TC) staining have successfully met these challenges and, in addition, greatly improved the efficiency of cytogenetic biodosimetry through the development of automated approaches, thus reducing the need for specialized personnel. Here, we review the role of the various cytogenetic dosimeters and their recent improvements in the management of populations exposed to genotoxic agents such as ionizing radiation. Finally, we discuss the emerging potentials to exploit these techniques in a wider spectrum of medical and biological applications, e.g., in cancer biology to identify prognostic biomarkers for the optimal triage and treatment of patients.

Indexed as

CentromereTelomereChromosome AberrationsCytogenetic AnalysisCytogeneticsDNA DamageHumansLymphocytesRadiometrycentromerechromosomal instabilitycytogenetic biodosimetryradioprotectiontelomere

Identifiers

PMID36982772
PMCPMC10054499
OpenAlexW4327716287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.